Climate Intervention Science

Geoengineering Research & Analysis

Exploring large-scale climate intervention technologies, from solar radiation management to carbon dioxide removal. Understanding the science, risks, and potential of planetary-scale environmental engineering.

Solar Radiation Management

Atmospheric reflectivity enhancement

Carbon Dioxide Removal

Direct air capture & storage

Ocean Interventions

Marine ecosystem enhancement

Weather Modification

Cloud seeding & precipitation

Global Research Status

Current State of Climate Engineering

As climate change accelerates, geoengineering research has expanded rapidly, with increasing investment in both mitigation and adaptation technologies.

Research Investment (2024) $2.8B
Active Research Programs 150+
Countries Researching 45

"Geoengineering represents both our greatest hope and our greatest risk in addressing climate change." - IPCC Report 2023

Research Overview

Understanding Climate Engineering

Geoengineering encompasses large-scale technological interventions designed to counteract climate change. Research spans theoretical modeling, small-scale experiments, and ethical frameworks.

Solar Radiation Management

Reflecting sunlight to cool Earth

SRM technologies aim to increase Earth's reflectivity (albedo) to reduce incoming solar radiation. These approaches could theoretically cool the planet relatively quickly but don't address ocean acidification.

Stratospheric Aerosol Injection

Releasing reflective particles into the upper atmosphere

Marine Cloud Brightening

Enhancing cloud reflectivity over oceans

Space-based Reflectors

Large mirrors or shields positioned in space

Key Considerations
  • • Rapid cooling potential but temporary effects
  • • Doesn't address CO₂ or ocean acidification
  • • Potential regional weather disruptions
  • • Governance and ethical challenges

Carbon Dioxide Removal

Extracting CO₂ from atmosphere

CDR technologies remove CO₂ directly from the atmosphere and store it permanently. These approaches address root causes of climate change but typically work more slowly than SRM.

Direct Air Capture

Industrial facilities that capture CO₂ from ambient air

Enhanced Weathering

Accelerating natural rock weathering processes

Ocean Alkalinization

Increasing ocean's capacity to absorb CO₂

Key Benefits
  • • Addresses root cause of climate change
  • • Permanent CO₂ removal potential
  • • Reduces ocean acidification
  • • Lower governance complexity

Geoengineering Research Timeline

1965

Early Weather Modification

First systematic cloud seeding programs begin

1992

NAS Report on Geoengineering

National Academy of Sciences first major geoengineering assessment

2006

Nobel Prize Recognition

Paul Crutzen's paper brings SRM into mainstream climate discourse

2015

Paris Agreement Era

Increased focus on negative emission technologies

2024

Current Research Boom

Major investments in CDR and SRM research programs worldwide

Technology Deep Dive

Geoengineering Technologies

Exploring the specific technologies, their mechanisms, current research status, and potential for deployment.

SRM

Stratospheric Aerosol Injection

Inject reflective particles (sulfur dioxide) into the stratosphere to mimic volcanic cooling effects.

Potential cooling: 1-2°C globally
Cost: $1-10 billion annually
Deployment: Theoretically ready

Risks & Challenges

  • • Ozone layer depletion potential
  • • Regional precipitation changes
  • • Termination problem
Research Status:
Early
CDR

Direct Air Capture

Industrial facilities using chemical processes to capture CO₂ directly from ambient air.

Current capacity: ~10kt CO₂/year
Cost: $100-600 per ton CO₂
Energy: 1.5-2 MWh per ton CO₂

Advantages

  • • Permanent CO₂ removal
  • • Scalable technology
  • • Lower governance risks
Research Status:
Advanced
SRM

Marine Cloud Brightening

Spray sea salt particles into marine clouds to increase their reflectivity and cooling effect.

Deployment: Ship-based systems
Target: Low marine stratocumulus
Coverage: Regional cooling

Current Research

  • • Small-scale field trials ongoing
  • • Modeling cloud interactions
  • • Spray technology development
Research Status:
Testing
CDR

Enhanced Weathering

Accelerate natural rock weathering by spreading crushed silicate minerals on agricultural land.

Materials: Basalt, olivine rocks
Co-benefit: Soil improvement
Potential: 2-4 Gt CO₂/year

Implementation

  • • Integrate with farming practices
  • • Large-scale mineral processing
  • • Long-term monitoring needed
Research Status:
Pilot
CDR

Ocean Alkalinization

Add alkaline materials to seawater to increase ocean's CO₂ absorption capacity and reduce acidification.

Method: Lime or olivine addition
Co-benefit: Reduces acidification
Scale: Ocean-wide deployment

Research Needs

  • • Ecosystem impact assessment
  • • Optimal alkalinity levels
  • • Distribution mechanisms
Research Status:
Concept
CDR

BECCS

Bioenergy + Carbon Capture

Generate energy from biomass while capturing and storing the CO₂ emissions, creating net negative emissions.

Biomass: Crops, forestry waste
Output: Electricity + negative CO₂
Constraint: Land use competition

Status

  • • Several pilot plants operational
  • • Integration with power plants
  • • Sustainable biomass sourcing
Research Status:
Demo

Technology Comparison Matrix

Technology Speed Cost Risk Level Permanence Readiness
Stratospheric Aerosol Injection
Direct Air Capture
Marine Cloud Brightening
Enhanced Weathering
High/Good
Medium
Low/Risky
Leading Research Institutions

Global Geoengineering Research Network

Major universities, research centers, and organizations advancing our understanding of climate engineering technologies.

Harvard University

Solar Geoengineering Research Program

Leading research on solar radiation management, modeling, and governance frameworks.

Stratospheric aerosol research
Climate modeling studies
Governance research

Oxford University

Geoengineering Programme

Interdisciplinary research on climate engineering ethics, governance, and technology assessment.

CDR technology development
Ethics and governance
Policy analysis

Carnegie Council

Climate Geoengineering Governance

Focus on international governance frameworks and ethical considerations.

International law research
Ethical frameworks
Stakeholder engagement

MIT

Climate & Geoengineering Research

Technology development and systems analysis for climate interventions.

Direct air capture systems
Energy system integration
Technology assessment

NOAA

Earth System Research Lab

Atmospheric monitoring and climate impact assessment of geoengineering.

Atmospheric chemistry
Climate monitoring
Impact modeling

CERG

Climate Engineering Research Governance

International network addressing governance of climate engineering research.

Research governance protocols
International coordination
Public engagement
Governance & Ethics

Managing Climate Engineering

Addressing the complex governance, ethical, and legal challenges surrounding geoengineering research and potential deployment.

Key Governance Challenges

International Coordination

Climate engineering affects global systems, requiring unprecedented international cooperation and governance frameworks.

Consent & Justice

Who has the right to alter the global climate? How do we ensure equitable representation in decision-making?

Moral Hazard

Risk that geoengineering research may reduce incentives for emissions reduction and mitigation efforts.

Termination Problem

Some technologies (like SRM) require continuous operation - stopping suddenly could cause rapid warming.

Ethical Frameworks

Precautionary Principle

Avoid actions with potentially catastrophic consequences, even under uncertainty.

Intergenerational Justice

Consider impacts on future generations and their right to inherit an unmanipulated climate system.

Distributive Justice

Ensure benefits and risks are fairly distributed across regions and populations.

Democratic Governance

Include affected communities in decision-making processes about climate interventions.

Oxford Principles for Geoengineering Governance

  1. 1. Geoengineering should be regulated as a public good
  2. 2. Public participation in decision-making
  3. 3. Disclosure of research and open publication
  4. 4. Independent assessment of impacts
  5. 5. Governance before deployment
Research Resources

Key Publications & Reports

Essential reading for understanding the current state of geoengineering science, technology, and governance.

IPCC AR6 Report

Working Group III, Chapter 12

Comprehensive assessment of carbon dioxide removal and solar radiation modification in climate policy.

Published: 2022
International consensus

NAS Reports

National Academy of Sciences

Detailed technical assessments of CDR and SRM technologies, research priorities, and governance needs.

Research roadmaps
Risk assessments

Scientific Journals

Nature, Science, Climate journals

Latest peer-reviewed research on geoengineering technologies, impacts, and governance frameworks.

Latest findings
Peer-reviewed

C2G Initiative

Carnegie Climate Governance

Governance-focused research on international frameworks and policy development for climate interventions.

Global governance
Policy frameworks

Technology Reports

MIT Tech Review, Others

Technology-focused analysis of geoengineering developments, startup companies, and deployment timelines.

Innovation tracking
Market analysis

Research Databases

Climate modeling tools

Climate models, simulation tools, and databases for geoengineering impact assessment and research.

Climate models
Data visualization
Future Outlook

The Next Decade of Geoengineering Research

Key developments, milestones, and decisions expected to shape the future of climate engineering research and potential deployment.

Research Priorities 2025-2035

Small-Scale Field Trials

Carefully controlled outdoor experiments to test SRM and CDR technologies in real-world conditions.

Timeline: 2025-2028

Improved Climate Models

Enhanced modeling capabilities to better predict regional and global impacts of geoengineering.

Timeline: 2025-2030

Governance Frameworks

Development of international agreements and governance structures for research and potential deployment.

Timeline: 2025-2035

CDR Scale-Up

Massive deployment of carbon removal technologies to achieve gigaton-scale CO₂ removal annually.

Timeline: 2030-2035

Critical Decision Points

Research vs. Deployment

When does research cross the line into deployment? How do we maintain the distinction?

International Coordination

Will nations cooperate on governance or proceed unilaterally with geoengineering programs?

Public Acceptance

How will public opinion shape research priorities and deployment decisions?

Climate Emergency Response

Could extreme climate events accelerate geoengineering deployment timelines?

Key Quote

"The question is not whether we will research geoengineering, but whether we will do so responsibly, with appropriate governance, transparency, and consideration for global justice."
— Climate Policy Expert, 2024

Stay Informed on Geoengineering Research

Geoengineering research is rapidly evolving. Follow the latest developments in climate engineering science, policy, and governance.